The Influence of Collective Opinion on True-False Judgment and Information-Sharing Decision
نویسندگان
چکیده
The purpose of the current work is to examine when and how knowing collective opinion influences people’s judgments and decisions in social media environments. In particular, the present work focuses on people’s true-false judgment of statements found on websites and the likelihood of sharing these statements. The results from Experiment 1 revealed that, for false statements, collective opinion had little influence on people’s true-false judgments, but, for true and debatable statements, their judgments were biased toward collective opinion. The results from Experiment 2 indicated that the likelihood of sharing the true, debatable, and false statements followed the collective opinion, and that people were less likely to share false statements than debatable or true ones without collective opinion. These findings extend past work on social influence and advance understanding of how people make judgments and decisions in social media websites.
منابع مشابه
Student Ratings of Instruction: True or False
Introduction. Students' evaluation of teaching is a major concern in higher education. In this regard, during the past 30 years hundreds of papers have been published which because of various grounds from valid, reliable to useless, such papers cannot be easily summarized. The present study investigated for two purposes, first was to out line opinions of two groups of advocates and opposites a...
متن کاملDetermining the components of a health information social network based on a Delphi study
Background & Objective: In recent years, social networks have been considered by organizations active in the field of health and have provided many opportunities to Consulting, training and information sharing and promise to increase the quality and safety of health care and reduce costs, so it is necessary to study their dimensions and requirements. The purpose of this study is to identify the...
متن کاملEFFECT OF CLINICAL IN FORMATION ON BRAIN CT SCAN IN T ERPRETATION: A BLIN DED DOUBLE CROSSOVER STUDY
Errors and variations in interpretation can happen in clinical imaging. Few studies have examined the biased effect of clinical information on reporting of brain CT scans. In a blinded double crossover design, we studied whether three radiologists were biased by clinical information when making CT scan diagnosis of the brain. Three consultant radiologists in three rounds with at least a one...
متن کاملMultiple attribute group decision making with linguistic variables and complete unknown weight information
Interval type-2 fuzzy sets, each of which is characterized by the footprint of uncertainty, are a very useful means to depict the linguistic information in the process of decision making. In this article, we investigate the group decision making problems in which all the linguistic information provided by the decision makers is expressed as interval type-2 fuzzy decision matrices where each of ...
متن کاملEffectiveness of the Auditor's Opinion Quality of Pygmalion Effect
The opinion of the audit is the final product of the audit process and a means of expressing the judgment of the auditor about the quality and content of the client's financial statements and plays a major role in creating confidence and convenience among users of financial statements, and at the top of their shareholders and investors. Since the audit report involves information and the means ...
متن کامل